Topics: Climate Change, COVID-19, Existentialism, Science
Science, as Carl Sagan wrote, has to be our “candle in the dark.”
The Scientific Method we developed as a hunter-gatherer species. The tools of hunter-gatherers were utilitarian, and pragmatic. Our ancestors observed things, and noticed patterns. They made mental notes of these patterns, and codified them through rituals, customs, and behaviors into distinct cultures defined by these traditions. Some kept this knowledge in secret, esoteric, as any knowledge is power over others. This probably is the reason why we’re so suspicious of any change in what was, or is new knowledge.
Many first-responders are BIPOC, so the resistance to it, probably from the apprehension around the Tuskegee Experiment, has an understandable history, but it’s still alarming. We can wear masks. We can contact trace. We can socially distance. We can take the Pfizer, Moderna, or AstraZeneca variants of the vaccine, and mitigate this more quickly.
Or, we can guarantee after a long dark winter, a longer slog through the spring, summer and fall. Herd immunity isn’t by brute force: it is intentionally engineered with vaccines.
WASHINGTON — Authorities are reporting early shipments of the COVID 19 vaccine will not cover all essential personnel who are supposed to be first in line to get it. The CDC’s immunization advisory panel voted Tuesday to give the first round of COVID-19 vaccines to health care personnel and long-term care facility residents.
Hundreds of thousands of frontline medical workers are at the top of that list. But surveys are showing that not all are eager to be first.
While 63% of health care workers reported to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control that they would accept the vaccine, the agency is concerned about the large numbers who are hesitant. The American Nurses Foundation is reporting 36% of nurses surveyed said they would not voluntarily get the COVID-19 vaccine once it’s deployed.
‘No one wants to be a guinea pig’ | Vaccine hesitancy divides health care workers, Scott Broom, ABC10 News
Carbon sequestration involves a lot of technology, or it can involve what Earth did before we discovered technology: plant more trees.
Forty-nine million years ago, a small aquatic fern called Azolla wrested control of Earth’s climate. At the time, the landlocked Arctic Ocean developed a surface layer of freshwater, which allowed the ferns to grow unchecked in a wide-open environment. Billions of tons of plants died and sank to the bottom of the ocean, taking with them the carbon they had sucked from the air when they were alive.
The consequences were extreme. Geologic evidence indicates that atmospheric carbon dioxide levels plummeted more than 80 percent over 800,000 years, sharply ratcheting down Earth’s thermostat. Prior to the inferred “Azolla Event,” most of the globe was lush and tropical. Afterward, the Arctic cooled by nearly 40 degrees Fahrenheit, the poles froze, and our planet entered a lurching cycle of ice ages that continue to this day.
How to Bury Carbon? Let Plants Do the Dirty Work, Cory S. Powell, Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory
This seems simple enough, but politicians like Jair Bolsonaro apparently came to power much like our one-term Neo-fascist did: lifted to office by right-wing Christian zealots in Brazil, particularly of the megachurch kind. From a dominionistic view, carbon sequestration shows a “lack of faith.” Forty-nine million years ago is a long way from a mere guestimate of ten-thousand years. Burning the Amazon, like for many cheering for Armageddon hastens the Apocalypse , and the Second Coming. It is thus, anathema.
I follow Politics and Prose on YouTube. David K. Johnston gave a speech at their bookstore some time ago on his book: “The Making of Donald Trump.” Many things weren’t a revelation to me, but one thing in particular stuck with me.
People the world over are afraid. Con artists, fascists, and strongmen play on fear.
I’m talking pre-pandemic afraid: afraid of change, afraid of diversity, afraid their particular sacred texts do not line up neatly with new scientific discoveries; afraid of their traditions being challenged in the light of Sagan’s candle. Such fear gives political power to strongmen (the antonym more accurate) that assure their crowds on their rise to power that they will return those fearful of change to a “golden age of greatness,” which they never really define. The other common thing is there is a scapegoated “other” on which all blame for everything wrong is laid. That is the history of the scapegoat, by the way. For humans, it leads to disdain, disregard, murder, and genocide.
For an otherwise intelligent species, that can lead to extinction.
A preprint paper in ArXiv gives the grim estimate that intelligent species over long stretches of time eventually annihilate themselves. I would really like us all to be the rare exceptions to this possible rule.